3 papers in the archive (2025), average empirical rigor 8.7/10, average math complexity 7.8/10. Quadrant mix: Holy Grail ×3.
Works mostly in Crypto Markets & DeFi, Machine Learning for Market Forecasting, Market Microstructure.
Frequent co-authors: Chi-Sheng Chen (3).
Scores are our LLM-assisted heuristics (methodology), not peer review or citation counts. Author pages are generated from paper metadata; name variants may split one person across pages. arXiv author page →
Ordered by a blend of empirical rigor (60%) and math complexity (40%).
We formulate automated market maker (AMM) \emph{“rebalancing”} as a binary detection problem and study a hybrid quantum–classical self-attention block, \textbf{“Quantum Adaptive Self-Attention (QASA)”}. QASA constructs quantum queries/keys/values via variational quantum circuits (VQCs) and applies s
This study presents a comprehensive empirical comparison between quantum machine learning (QML) and classical machine learning (CML) approaches in Automated Market Makers (AMM) and Decentralized Finance (DeFi) trading strategies through extensive backtesting on 10 models across multiple cryptocurren
The rise of decentralized finance (DeFi) has created a growing demand for accurate yield and performance forecasting to guide liquidity allocation strategies. In this study, we benchmark six models, XGBoost, Random Forest, LSTM, Transformer, quantum neural networks (QNN), and quantum support vector