3 papers in the archive (2025–2026), average empirical rigor 8.2/10, average math complexity 7.5/10. Quadrant mix: Holy Grail ×3.
Works mostly in Portfolio Optimization, Risk Management & Tail Risk, Stochastic Control & Optimal Stopping, Market Simulation & Agent-Based Models.
Scores are our LLM-assisted heuristics (methodology), not peer review or citation counts. Author pages are generated from paper metadata; name variants may split one person across pages. arXiv author page →
Ordered by a blend of empirical rigor (60%) and math complexity (40%).
We tackle high-dimensional, path-dependent valuation and control and introduce a deep BSDE/2BSDE solver that couples truncated log-signatures with a neural rough differential equation (RDE) backbone. The architecture aligns stochastic analysis with sequence-to-path learning: a CVaR-tilted terminal o
We examine whether regime-conditioned generative scenarios combined with a convex CVaR allocator improve portfolio decisions under regime shifts. We present MARCD, a generative-to-decision framework with: (i) a Gaussian HMM to infer latent regimes; (ii) a diffusion generator that produces regime-con
When developers change one component of an agent, such as its controller, a learned model or its verifier, they usually judge the change by an aggregate task score. That score cannot tell whether improvement was attainable, which component lost value, or what the agent’s own checks certify. We intro