3 papers in the archive (2025–2026), average empirical rigor 8.5/10, average math complexity 8/10. Quadrant mix: Holy Grail ×3.
Works mostly in Portfolio Optimization, Risk Management & Tail Risk.
Frequent co-authors: Rupendra Yadav (3), Amita Sharma (1).
Scores are our LLM-assisted heuristics (methodology), not peer review or citation counts. Author pages are generated from paper metadata; name variants may split one person across pages. arXiv author page →
Ordered by a blend of empirical rigor (60%) and math complexity (40%).
This study introduces a portfolio optimization framework to minimize mixed conditional value at risk (MCVaR), incorporating a chance constraint on expected returns and limiting the number of assets via cardinality constraints. A robust MCVaR model is presented, which presumes ellipsoidal support for
Expectiles are the only law-invariant risk measures that are both coherent and elicitable. Unlike Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), however, they do not admit a Rockafellar–Uryasev representation that admits tractable Wasserstein reformulations. We address this difficulty by developing an envelope
The mean-variance model remains the most prevalent investment framework, built on diversification principles. However, it consistently struggles with estimation errors in expected returns and the covariance matrix, its core parameters. To address this concern, this research evaluates the performance