7 papers in the archive (2025), average empirical rigor 6.8/10, average math complexity 9/10. Quadrant mix: Holy Grail ×5, Lab Rats ×2.
Works mostly in Volatility Modeling & Forecasting, Options & Derivatives Pricing, Reinforcement Learning for Trading, Risk Management & Tail Risk.
Scores are our LLM-assisted heuristics (methodology), not peer review or citation counts. Author pages are generated from paper metadata; name variants may split one person across pages. arXiv author page →
Ordered by a blend of empirical rigor (60%) and math complexity (40%).
We study the construction of SPX–VIX (multi\textendash product) option surfaces that are simultaneously free of static arbitrage and dynamically chain\textendash consistent across maturities. Our method unifies \emph{“constructive”} PCA–Smolyak approximation and a \emph{“chain\textendash consistent”
We propose ARBITER, a risk-neutral neural operator for learning joint SPX-VIX term structures under no-arbitrage constraints. ARBITER maps market states to an operator that outputs implied volatility and variance curves while enforcing static arbitrage (calendar, vertical, butterfly), Lipschitz boun
We formulate option market making as a constrained, risk-sensitive control problem that unifies execution, hedging, and arbitrage-free implied-volatility surfaces inside a single learning loop. A fully differentiable eSSVI layer enforces static no-arbitrage conditions (butterfly and calendar) while
Transaction costs and regime shifts are major reasons why paper portfolios fail in live trading. We introduce FR-LUX (Friction-aware, Regime-conditioned Learning under eXecution costs), a reinforcement learning framework that learns after-cost trading policies and remains robust across volatility-li
We present a white-box, risk-sensitive framework for jointly hedging SPX and VIX exposures under transaction costs and regime shifts. The approach couples an arbitrage-free market teacher with a control layer that enforces safety as constraints. On the market side, we integrate an SSVI-based implied
We introduce Tail-Safe, a deployability-oriented framework for derivatives hedging that unifies distributional, risk-sensitive reinforcement learning with a white-box control-barrier-function (CBF) quadratic-program (QP) safety layer tailored to financial constraints. The learning component combines
We study reinforcement learning (RL) on volatility surfaces through the lens of Scientific AI. We ask whether axiomatic no-arbitrage laws, imposed as soft penalties on a learned world model, can reliably align high-capacity RL agents, or mainly create Goodhart-style incentives to exploit model error