Papers, ranked by score

Ordered by a blend of empirical rigor (60%) and math complexity (40%).

MintEval: Do LLMs Implement the Trading Strategy You Asked For? A Behavioural-Equivalence Benchmark for Natural-Language-to-Strategy Code

Large language models are moving from producing trading signals to writing the code that executes them. The failure mode of the second role is silent: generated code runs, a backtest plots, yet the risk logic that the trader described is not the logic being executed. Existing code benchmarks test fu

Holy Grail Math 6 Rigor 9 Code ·  October 2, 2026

QuantaAlpha: An Evolutionary Framework for LLM-Driven Alpha Mining

Financial markets are noisy and non-stationary, making alpha mining highly sensitive to noise in backtesting results and sudden market regime shifts. While recent agentic frameworks improve alpha mining automation, they often lack controllable multi-round search and reliable reuse of validated exper

Street Traders Math 3.5 Rigor 8 ·  February 6, 2026

On-chain Peak Shaving

Blockchain technology is widely expected to reduce transaction costs by automating contract enforcement and eliminating intermediaries; yet, the execution costs imposed by network congestion have received little attention in the operations management literature. We study on-chain peak shaving, the s

Street Traders Math 3.5 Rigor 7.5 ·  April 1, 2026

Browse

All authors · Research topics · Papers with code · Download the scored dataset

📬 The Quant Space Weekly

One email a week: the most interesting quant finance papers, scored and summarized. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.