Paper: arXiv 2509.03035
Authors: Viktor Tsyrennikov
Abstract
In the LIBOR era, banks routinely tied revolving credit facilities to credit-sensitive benchmarks. This study assesses the Across-the-Curve Credit Spread Index (AXI) – a transparent, transaction-based measure of wholesale bank funding costs – as a complement to SOFR, summarizing its behavior, construction, and loan-pricing implications. AXI aggregates observable unsecured funding transactions across short- and long-term maturities to produce a daily credit spread that is IOSCO-aligned and operationally compatible with SOFR-based infrastructure. The Financial Conditions Credit Spread Index (FXI) is a broader market companion to AXI and serves as its fallback. FXI co-moves closely with AXI in normal times; under stress, the correlation of daily changes exceeds 0.9 for economy-wide shocks and remains strong in bank-specific stress, around 0.8 during the Silicon Valley Bank episode. Empirically, AXI is strongly correlated with standard credit-spread measures and market-stress indicators and is inversely related to financial-sector performance. SOFR+AXI exhibits correlations with macroeconomic variables with the signs and magnitudes expected of a credit-sensitive rate. In loan-pricing applications, SOFR+AXI reduces funding risk and can support spread discounts of up to 65 basis points without lowering risk-adjusted returns. In stress scenarios, banks relying on SOFR-only pricing can fail to recover as much as 15 basis points on revolving credit lines over as little as three months. Taken together, AXI restores the credit sensitivity lost in the USD LIBOR transition while avoiding reliance on thin short-term markets, delivering significant economic value.
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 3.5/10
- Empirical Rigor: 6.5/10
- Quadrant: Street Traders — practical and empirical, lighter on theory
Why this score: The paper provides a strong empirical analysis of the Across-the-Curve Credit Spread Index (AXI) as a credit-sensitive complement to SOFR, highlighting its behavior during bank stress events. While the underlying mathematics is primarily focused on volume-weighted averaging and correlation measures, the practical implications for loan pricing and risk management are thoroughly demonstrated.
Research Flowchart
flowchart TD
A["Research Goal: Evaluate AXI as a Credit-Sensitive<br>Complement to SOFR for Loan Pricing"] --> B["Data Inputs: Observable Unsecured Funding Transactions<br>& Macro/Financial Stress Indicators"]
B --> C["Construct Indices: AXI (Bank Funding)<br>& FXI (Broad Market Fallback)"]
C --> D["Empirical Analysis: Assess Correlation with<br>Credit Spreads & Stress Co-movement"]
C --> E["Loan Pricing Simulations: Compare SOFR+AXI<br>vs. SOFR-Only in Normal & Stress Conditions"]
D --> F["Findings: AXI matches stress indicators;<br>FXI & AXI correlate strongly (>0.8 to 0.9+)"]
E --> G["Outcomes: SOFR+AXI enables up to 65 bps spread<br>discounts & prevents up to 15 bps funding loss in stress"]
Cited References (38)
- Bank Funding Risk, Reference Rates, and Credit Supply (2025) — link
- Bank Funding Risk, Reference Rates, and Credit Supply (2022) — link
- Across-the-Curve Credit Spread Indices (2023) — link
- Statement on Alternatives to USD LIBOR (2023) — link
- Regarding Credit‑Sensitive Benchmarks in Lending (2019) — link
- How Correlated Is LIBOR with Bank Funding Costs? (2020) — link
- AXI/FXI Limited Assurance Review Report (2024)
- Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods (1969)
and 30 more
- How Did Banks Fund C&I Drawdowns at the Onset of the COVID-19 Crisis? (2020) — [link](https://doi.org/{10.17016/2380-7172.2601} % url={https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/how-did-banks-fund-c-and-i-drawdowns-at-the-onset-of-the-covid-19-crisis-20200731.html})
- Interest Received by Banks during the Financial Crisis: LIBOR vs Hypothetical SOFR Loans (2024) — link
- Unintended Impact of LIBOR-SOFR Transition on Credit Markets and Economic Activity (2023) — link
- AXI Index (Across‑the‑Curve Credit Spread Index) Overview (n.d.) — link
- Central Bank Lending Lessons from the 2023 Bank Crisis (2024)
- Beyond LIBOR: a primer on the new benchmark rates (2019) — link
- Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty (2016) — link
- Economic Policy Uncertainty and the Yield Curve (2022)
- Monitoring Financial Stability: A Financial Conditions Index Approach (2011)
- Term Premiums and Inflation Uncertainty: Empirical Evidence from an International Panel Dataset (2019)
- Term Structure Modeling of SOFR: Evaluating the Importance of Scheduled Jumps (2023)
- Short Rate Dynamics: A Fed Funds and SOFR perspective (2021) — link
- What drives jumps in the secured Overnight Financing Rate? Evidence from the arbitrage-free Nelson–Siegel model with jump diffusion (2024) — link
- A User’s Guide to AXI & FXI: Credit-Spread Reference Benchmarks for the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (2024) — link
- The Risk of Being a Fallen Angel and the Corporate Dash for Cash in the Midst of COVID (2020) — link
- Bank Lending during the Financial Crisis of 2008 (2010) — link
- Good News for the Next Economic Downturn: Home Equity Use Is Low (2019) — link
- Second Report of the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (2018) — link
- Mutual Fund Performance (1966) — link
- A User’s Guide to SOFR (2021 Update) (2021) — link
- Econometric Analysis (2017)
- Additional Information about Reference Rates Administered by the New York Fed (2024) — link
- Assets and Liabilities of Commercial Banks in the United States (H.8) (2025) — link
- Banking System Conditions (2021) — link
- Options for Using SOFR in Adjustable Rate Mortgages (2019) — link
- Stress Test Scenarios: Domestic Data Definitions (2025) — link
- Default, Transition, and Recovery: 2023 Annual Global Financial Services Default and Rating Transition Study (2024) — link
- Defaults, Losses and Rating Transitions on Bonds Issued by Financial Institutions: 1983–2004 (2005) — link
- Quarterly Banking Profile: First Quarter 2022 (2020) — link
- Fixed Income Securities: Tools for Today’s Markets (2022)
0 of 38 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.