Paper: arXiv 2506.00010

Authors: Zachary H. Thomas, Ellen D. Williams, Kavita Surana, Morgan R. Edwards

Abstract

Accelerating climate-tech innovation in the formative stage of the technology life cycle is crucial to meeting climate policy goals. During this period, competing technologies are often undergoing major technical improvements within a nascent value chain. We analyze this formative stage for 14 climate-tech sectors using a dataset of 4,172 North American firms receiving 12,929 early-stage private investments between 2006 and 2021. Investments in these firms reveal that commercialization occurs in five distinct product clusters across the value chain. Only 15% of firms develop end products (i.e., downstream products bought by consumers), while 59% support these end products through components, manufacturing processes, or optimization products, and 26% develop business services. Detailed analysis of the temporal evolution of investments reveals the driving forces behind the technologies that commercialize, such as innovation spillovers, coalescence around a dominant design, and flexible regulatory frameworks. We identify three patterns of innovation: emerging innovation (e.g., agriculture), characterized by recent growth in private investments across most product clusters and spillover from other sectors; ongoing innovation (e.g., energy storage), characterized by multiple waves of investments in evolving products; and maturing innovation (e.g., energy efficiency), characterized by a dominant end product with a significant share of investments in optimization and services. Understanding the development of nascent value chains can inform policy design to best support scaling of climate-tech by identifying underfunded elements in the value chain and supporting development of a full value chain rather than only end products.

Complexity vs Empirical Score

  • Math Complexity: 1.5/10
  • Empirical Rigor: 6.8/10
  • Quadrant: Street Traders — practical and empirical, lighter on theory

Why this score: The paper relies on qualitative content analysis and NLP keyword mapping rather than mathematical modeling, placing its math complexity near zero. However, it demonstrates solid empirical rigor through the systematic analysis of over 12,000 venture investments across 15 years, providing novel insights into climate-tech value chain development and actionable policy implications.

Research Flowchart

  flowchart TD
    A[Research Goal: Assess climate-tech innovation <br>in nascent value chains] --> B[Data Collection: 4,172 NA firms & <br>12,929 VC/PE investments 2006-2021]
    B --> C[Methodology: Map investments across 14 sectors <br>& analyze temporal evolution]
    C --> D[Value Chain Segmentation: 5 Product Clusters]
    D --> E1[Cluster Breakdown: <br>15% End Products | 59% Upstream Tech | 26% Services]
    C --> F[Identify Innovation Drivers: Spillovers, <br>dominant design, flexible regulation]
    F --> E2[3 Innovation Archetypes: <br>Emerging, Ongoing, & Maturing]
    E1 --> G[Policy Outcome: Support full value chains, <br>not just end products]
    E2 --> G

Cited References (57)

  1. Green building blocks reveal the complex anatomy of climate change mitigation technologies (2025) — link
  2. A strategic approach to evaluating battery innovation investments (2024) — link
  3. The effects of corporate investment and public grants on climate and energy startup outcomes (2024) — link
  4. ‘The’ key 2024 election involving climate change and the energy transition: Biden vs Trump 2.0 and the matter of global trust in the US (2024) — link
  5. Recent legislation in the United States: consequences for the US and global energy and climate innovation systems (2023) — link
  6. The role of corporate investment in start-ups for climate-tech innovation (2023) — link
  7. The who and how of commercializing emerging technologies: A technology-focused review (2022) — link
  8. Towards the lithium-ion battery production network: Thinking beyond mineral supply chains (2022) — link
and 49 more
  1. Facilitating Power Grid Decarbonization with Distributed Energy Resources: Lessons from the United States (2021) — link
  2. Accelerating Low-Carbon Innovation (2020) — link
  3. Author Correction: Federal energy R&D: Startups supported by ARPA-E were more innovative than others but an investment gap may remain (2020) — link
  4. Effects of technology complexity on the emergence and evolution of wind industry manufacturing locations along global value chains (2020) — link
  5. Granular technologies to accelerate decarbonization (2020) — link
  6. Crop biotechnology for sustainable agriculture in the face of climate crisis (2020) — link
  7. Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) — link
  8. Governments as partners: The role of alliances in U.S. cleantech startup innovation (2019) — link
  9. Local demand-pull policy and energy innovation: Evidence from the solar photovoltaic market in China (2019) — link
  10. Start-ups as technology life cycle indicator for the early stage of application: An analysis of the battery value chain (2018) — link
  11. The Need for Continued Innovation in Solar, Wind, and Energy Storage (2018) — link
  12. Time to get ready: Conceptualizing the temporal and spatial dynamics of formative phases for energy technologies (2018) — link
  13. Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets (2018) — link
  14. Market and regulatory barriers to electrical energy storage innovation (2018) — link
  15. Precision Agriculture Technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions mitigation, farm productivity and economics (2017) — link
  16. Venture Capital and Cleantech: The wrong model for energy innovation (2017) — link
  17. Measuring the duration of formative phases for energy technologies (2016) — link
  18. Innovation and technology transfer through global value chains: Evidence from China’s PV industry (2016) — link
  19. Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation and the Challenges to Its Extension to Nonlegumes (2016) — link
  20. Technology Life-Cycles in the Energy Sector – Technological Characteristics and the Role of Deployment for Innovation (2016) — link
  21. Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles (2015) — link
  22. Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies (2012) — link
  23. The Energy Technology Innovation System (2012) — link
  24. The Role of Agriculture in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions (2010) — link
  25. Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects (2010) — link
  26. Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change (2009) — link
  27. The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology (2006) — link
  28. The governance of global value chains (2005) — link
  29. The Blended Value Proposition: Integrating Social and Financial Returns (2003) — link
  30. Introduction: Globalisation, Value Chains and Development (2001) — link
  31. Competitive Advantage of Nations (1990) — link
  32. How do global manufacturing shifts affect long-term clean energy innovation? A study of wind energy suppliers (2022) — link
  33. Complementarity formation mechanisms in technology value chains (2022) — link
  34. Future in Battery Production: An Extensive Benchmarking of Novel Production Technologies as Guidance for Decision Making in Engineering (2022) — link
  35. Cleantech Group 2022 Cleantech Group i3 Database (2022)
  36. A cooperative federalism model for building energy codes (2021)
  37. Transportation energy resources from renewable agriculture (2021)
  38. ROOTS 2021 Rhizosphere observations optimizing terrestrial sequestration (2021)
  39. The contribution of precision agriculture technologies to farm productivity and the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in the EU (2019) — link
  40. Innovation Landscape Brief: Utility-scale Batteries (2019)
  41. A behind the scenes take on lithium-ion battery prices (BloombergNEF) (2019)
  42. Public financing of innovation: new questions (2017) — link
  43. Emerging clean energy technology (2017)
  44. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures (2015) — link
  45. Congressional Budget (2015)
  46. Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of agricultural land management in the United States (Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University) Report No.: (2012)
  47. A handbook for value chain research (2002)
  48. How does investment in different product clusters along the nascent value chain evolve over time and across sectors as climate-mitigating technologies mature?
  49. I 2023 Global Landscape of Renewable Energy Finance 2023

0 of 57 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.