Incentive-Compatible Recovery from Manipulated Signals, with Applications to Decentralized Physical Infrastructure

ArXiv ID: 2503.07558 “View on arXiv”

Authors: Unknown

Abstract

We introduce the first formal model capturing the elicitation of unverifiable information from a party (the “source”) with implicit signals derived by other players (the “observers”). Our model is motivated in part by applications in decentralized physical infrastructure networks (a.k.a. “DePIN”), an emerging application domain in which physical services (e.g., sensor information, bandwidth, or energy) are provided at least in part by untrusted and self-interested parties. A key challenge in these signal network applications is verifying the level of service that was actually provided by network participants. We first establish a condition called source identifiability, which we show is necessary for the existence of a mechanism for which truthful signal reporting is a strict equilibrium. For a converse, we build on techniques from peer prediction to show that in every signal network that satisfies the source identifiability condition, there is in fact a strictly truthful mechanism, where truthful signal reporting gives strictly higher total expected payoff than any less informative equilibrium. We furthermore show that this truthful equilibrium is in fact the unique equilibrium of the mechanism if there is positive probability that any one observer is unconditionally honest (e.g., if an observer were run by the network owner). Also, by extending our condition to coalitions, we show that there are generally no collusion-resistant mechanisms in the settings that we consider. We apply our framework and results to two DePIN applications: proving location, and proving bandwidth. In the location-proving setting observers learn (potentially enlarged) Euclidean distances to the source. Here, our condition has an appealing geometric interpretation, implying that the source’s location can be truthfully elicited if and only if it is guaranteed to lie inside the convex hull of the observers.

Keywords: Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN), Peer Prediction, Mechanism Design, Information Elicitation, Game Theory, Crypto / Decentralized Networks

Complexity vs Empirical Score

• Math Complexity: 9.0/10
• Empirical Rigor: 1.5/10
• Quadrant: Lab Rats
• Why: The paper is highly theoretical, establishing formal game-theoretic conditions (source identifiability) and using peer prediction techniques with rigorous proofs, but lacks any code, backtests, datasets, or implementation details for its DePIN applications.

  flowchart TD
    A["Research Goal: Elicit Unverifiable Info from Source using Observers in DePIN"] --> B["Define Model & Methodology: Signal Networks, Equilibrium Analysis"]
    B --> C{"Data/Input: Applications: Proving Location & Bandwidth"}
    C --> D{"Computational Process: Test Source Identifiability Condition"}
    D -- Condition Met --> E["Outcome: Strictly Truthful Mechanism Exists"]
    D -- Not Met --> F["Outcome: No Truthful Mechanism Exists"]
    E --> G["Key Finding: Truthful Equilibrium is Unique if Observers are Unconditionally Honest"]
    F --> H["Key Finding: Mechanisms Generally Not Collusion-Resistant"]