Incharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale: Development, Administration, and Score Interpretation
ArXiv ID: ssrn-2239338 “View on arXiv”
Authors: Unknown
Abstract
This article describes development of the InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale, designed to measure a latent construct representing responses
Keywords: Financial Well-Being, Financial Distress, Scale Development, Personal Finance, Psychometrics, Personal Finance
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 2.0/10
- Empirical Rigor: 7.0/10
- Quadrant: Street Traders
- Why: The paper focuses on developing and validating a psychometric scale (financial well-being/distress), which involves statistical methods like factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha, but lacks advanced mathematical theory or derivations. It is highly data and implementation-heavy, involving a rigorous multi-step process to develop, test, and norm a measurement tool for practical use in financial counseling.
flowchart TD
A["Research Goal<br/>Develop & Validate Financial<br/>Distress/Well-Being Scale"] --> B["Data Collection<br/>Survey of 405 Adults"]
B --> C["Methodology Steps<br/>Exploratory & Confirmatory<br/>Factor Analysis"]
C --> D["Computational Processes<br/>Reliability Tests &<br/>Score Interpretation Algorithm"]
D --> E["Key Outcomes<br/>Validated 8-Item Scale<br/>Distress/Well-Being Metric"]