Paper: arXiv 2512.06639
Authors: Zaniar Ahmadi, Frédéric Godin
Abstract
This paper investigates the deep hedging framework, based on reinforcement learning (RL), for the dynamic hedging of swaptions, contrasting its performance with traditional sensitivity-based rho-hedging. We design agents under three distinct objective functions (mean squared error, downside risk, and Conditional Value-at-Risk) to capture alternative risk preferences and evaluate how these objectives shape hedging styles. Relying on a three-factor arbitrage-free dynamic Nelson-Siegel model for our simulation experiments, our findings show that near-optimal hedging effectiveness is achieved when using two swaps as hedging instruments. Deep hedging strategies dynamically adapt the hedging portfolio’s exposure to risk factors across states of the market. In our experiments, their out-performance over rho-hedging strategies persists even in the presence some of model misspecification. These results highlight RL’s potential to deliver more efficient and resilient swaption hedging strategies.
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 6.5/10
- Empirical Rigor: 7.5/10
- Quadrant: Holy Grail — high math complexity, high empirical rigor
Why this score: This paper successfully extends deep reinforcement learning dynamic hedging to interest rate swaptions using a three-factor discrete-time dynamic Nelson-Siegel model. It features solid mathematical foundations, clear empirical comparative analysis across multiple risk objectives, and public code repositories for strong reproducibility.
Research Flowchart
flowchart TD
A["Research Goal: Evaluate Deep Hedging (RL) vs. Traditional Rho-Hedging for Swaptions"] --> B["Simulation & Data: 3-Factor Arbitrage-Free Dynamic Nelson-Siegel Model"]
B --> C["Agent Training: RL Deep Hedging with 3 Risk Objectives (MSE, Downside Risk, CVaR)"]
C --> D["Execution & Benchmarking: Dynamic Portfolio Adjustment using 2 Hedging Swaps vs. Rho-Hedging"]
D --> E["Stress Testing: Performance Evaluation under Model Misspecification & Market Shifts"]
E --> F["Key Outcomes: RL achieves near-optimal efficiency, dynamically adapts risk exposure, and outperforms rho-hedging"]
Cited References (48)
- The discrete-time arbitrage-free N elson- S iegel model: A closed-form solution and applications to mixed funds representation (2024)
- Interest rate models: theory and practice (2001)
- Pricing swaptions and zero-coupon futures options under the discrete-time arbitrage-free N elson– S iegel model (2023)
- Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification (2015)
- KAN : Kolmogorov- A rnold networks (2024) — link
- Kolmogorov- A rnold Networks are Radial Basis Function Networks (2024) — link
- OTC derivatives statistics at end- J une 2024 (2024) — link
- Parsimonious modeling of yield curves (1987)
and 40 more
- Optimization of C onditional V alue-at- R isk (2000)
- Deep hedging (2019)
- Mish: A self regularized non-monotonic activation function (2019) — link
- Evaluation of participating endowment life insurance policies in a stochastic environment (2024)
- Adam: A method for stochastic optimization (2014) — link
- Forecasting the term structure of government bond yields (2006)
- The affine arbitrage-free class of N elson– S iegel term structure models (2011)
- LIBOR and swap market models and measures (1997)
- On the simultaneous calibration of multifactor lognormal interest rate models to Black volatilities and to the correlation matrix (1999)
- Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: A new methodology for contingent claims valuation (1992)
- Towards a central interest rate model (2001)
- Deep Hedging with Options Using the Implied Volatility Surface — → 2504.06208
- Enhancing deep hedging of options with implied volatility surface feedback information — → 2407.21138
- The performance of multi-factor term structure models for pricing and hedging caps and swaptions (2003)
- On pricing and hedging in the swaption market: How many factors, really? (2007)
- Simulated Swaption Delta-Hedging in the lognormal LIBOR model (2001)
- A new taxonomy of the dynamic term structure models (2010)
- Pricing, Calibration and Hedging under the LIBOR model (2024)
- Deep Hedging B ermudan Swaptions — → 2411.10079
- Deep learning-based BSDE solver for LIBOR market model with application to B ermudan swaption pricing and hedging (2018) — link
- A comparison of single factor Markov-functional and multi factor market models (2010)
- Analysis of the Hedging Performance of Select Term Structure Models in a Real World Evolution Framework (2015)
- Hedging in the possible presence of unspanned stochastic volatility: Evidence from swaption markets (2003)
- The compatibility of one-factor market models in caps and swaptions markets: Evidence from their dynamic hedging performance (2008)
- Simulated swaption delta–hedging in the lognormal forward LIBOR model (2001)
- Deep hedging of derivatives using reinforcement learning (2021)
- Empirical deep hedging (2023)
- Delta hedging of derivatives using deep reinforcement learning (2021)
- Deep reinforcement learning for dynamic stock option hedging: A review (2023)
- Pricing and hedging interest rate options: Evidence from cap–floor markets (2005)
- Pricing interest-rate-derivative securities (1990)
- The market model of interest rate dynamics (1997)
- Stochastic volatility model with time-dependent skew (2005)
- Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions (2014)
- A unified approach to interpreting model predictions (2017)
- Term structure movements and pricing interest rate contingent claims (1986)
- An equilibrium characterization of the term structure (1977)
- Managing smile risk (2002)
- The pricing of commodity contracts (1976)
- Term premia and interest rate forecasts in affine models (2002)
3 of 48 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.