QuantAgent: Seeking Holy Grail in Trading by Self-Improving Large Language Model
ArXiv ID: 2402.03755 “View on arXiv”
Authors: Unknown
Abstract
Autonomous agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) that devise plans and tackle real-world challenges have gained prominence.However, tailoring these agents for specialized domains like quantitative investment remains a formidable task. The core challenge involves efficiently building and integrating a domain-specific knowledge base for the agent’s learning process. This paper introduces a principled framework to address this challenge, comprising a two-layer loop.In the inner loop, the agent refines its responses by drawing from its knowledge base, while in the outer loop, these responses are tested in real-world scenarios to automatically enhance the knowledge base with new insights.We demonstrate that our approach enables the agent to progressively approximate optimal behavior with provable efficiency.Furthermore, we instantiate this framework through an autonomous agent for mining trading signals named QuantAgent. Empirical results showcase QuantAgent’s capability in uncovering viable financial signals and enhancing the accuracy of financial forecasts.
Keywords: Large Language Models (LLMs), Autonomous Agents, Quantitative Investment, Knowledge Base, Trading Signal Mining
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 4.5/10
- Empirical Rigor: 7.0/10
- Quadrant: Street Traders
- Why: The paper focuses on a framework for self-improving LLM agents and includes empirical results on signal mining and forecasting accuracy, indicating a strong implementation focus with backtesting-ready components. While it references theoretical analysis with RL concepts like Markov Decision Processes, the mathematical exposition in the provided excerpt is not dense with advanced formulas or derivations.
flowchart TD
A["Research Goal: Develop Self-Improving LLM Agent for Trading"] --> B["Two-Layer Loop Framework"]
B --> C{"Inner Loop"}
C --> D["Query Agent<br>Knowledge Base"]
D --> E["Refine Responses<br>via Prompting"]
E --> F["Generate<br>Trading Signals"]
B --> G{"Outer Loop"}
G --> H["Backtest Signals<br>on Market Data"]
H --> I["Update Knowledge Base<br>with New Insights"]
I --> C
F --> J["Key Findings"]
H --> J
J --> K["Provable Efficiency<br>in Optimal Behavior"]
J --> L["Viable Financial<br>Signals Uncovered"]
J --> M["Enhanced Financial<br>Forecast Accuracy"]