Paper: arXiv 2605.07558
Authors: Kuo-Ping Chang
Abstract
This paper refutes the claim that the expected rate of return of the underlying asset plays no role in the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model.
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 5.5/10
- Empirical Rigor: 2.0/10
- Quadrant: Lab Rats — theoretically deep, empirically untested
Why this score: The paper attempts to challenge a fundamental concept in option pricing theory using standard stochastic calculus derivations. However, it lacks empirical validation, empirical data backtesting, and relies on a misunderstanding of risk-neutral pricing principles, limiting its contribution.
Research Flowchart
flowchart TD
A[Research Goal: Evaluate role of expected rate of return in BSM model] --> B[Data Inputs: Underlying Asset Dynamics & Option Contracts]
B --> C[Methodology: Apply Stochastic Calculus & Ito's Lemma]
C --> D[Computational Process: Derive Geometric Brownian Motion Differential Equations]
D --> E[Key Outcome: Refute claim that expected return plays no role in BSM]