The End of History for Corporate Law
ArXiv ID: ssrn-204528 “View on arXiv”
Authors: Unknown
Abstract
Despite the apparent divergence in institutions of governance, share ownership, capital markets, and business culture across developed economies, the basic law
Keywords: corporate governance, share ownership, capital markets, business culture, legal institutions, Equities
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 1.5/10
- Empirical Rigor: 0.5/10
- Quadrant: Philosophers
- Why: The paper is purely conceptual, discussing legal and normative consensus in corporate law without any mathematical formulas or empirical data; it is a theoretical analysis of legal convergence.
flowchart TD
A["Research Goal: Do cross-country differences in governance, ownership, and capital markets constitute a fundamental divergence, or is there a convergence?"] --> B["Methodology: Comparative Legal & Financial Analysis"]
B --> C["Data Inputs: Legal doctrines, share ownership structures, capital market depth, business culture metrics"]
C --> D["Analysis: Pattern matching across developed economies"]
D --> E["Finding 1: Convergent forces dominate; legal forms converge toward shareholder primacy."]
D --> F["Finding 2: Institutional differences (ownership, culture) persist but do not alter the core economic logic."]
E --> G["Outcome: 'End of History' thesis—market forces select efficient, shareholder-centric corporate law."]
F --> G