The Negative Drift of a Limit Order Fill
ArXiv ID: 2407.16527 “View on arXiv”
Authors: Unknown
Abstract
Market making refers to a form of trading in financial markets characterized by passive orders which add liquidity to limit order books. Market makers are important for the proper functioning of financial markets worldwide. Given the importance, financial mathematics has endeavored to derive optimal strategies for placing limit orders in this context. This paper identifies a key discrepancy between popular model assumptions and the realities of real markets, specifically regarding the dynamics around limit order fills. Traditionally, market making models rely on an assumption of low-cost random fills, when in reality we observe a high-cost non-random fill behavior. Namely, limit order fills are caused by and coincide with adverse price movements, which create a drag on the market maker’s profit and loss. We refer to this phenomenon as “the negative drift” associated with limit order fills. We describe a discrete market model and prove theoretically that the negative drift exists. We also provide a detailed empirical simulation using one of the most traded financial instruments in the world, the 10 Year US Treasury Bond futures, which also confirms its existence. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to describe and prove this phenomenon in such detail.
Keywords: Market making, Limit order book, Adverse selection, Negative drift, 10 Year US Treasury Bond futures, Fixed Income (Futures)
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 7.0/10
- Empirical Rigor: 4.0/10
- Quadrant: Lab Rats
- Why: The paper presents a theoretical proof using a discrete market model and references stochastic processes (SDEs, Poisson rates), indicating advanced math, but the empirical component is a single-asset simulation rather than a multi-asset backtest or implementation-heavy analysis.
flowchart TD
A["Research Goal: Investigate discrepancy between idealized models<br>and actual limit order fill dynamics"] --> B["Method: Discrete Market Model"]
A --> C["Method: Empirical Simulation"]
B --> D["Theoretical Proof: Demonstrated existence<br>of adverse price movement upon fill"]
C --> E["Data: 10 Year US Treasury Bond Futures<br>(One of world's most traded instruments)"]
E --> F["Simulation Process: Modeled real market execution<br>with accurate fill timing"]
D --> G["Key Finding: Confirmed 'Negative Drift'<br>Limit orders fill during adverse price movements"]
F --> G
G --> H["Outcome: Models must account for<br>high-cost non-random fill behavior<br>vs. low-cost random fill assumption"]