Paper: arXiv 2505.14565
Authors: Pietro Saggese, Michael Fröwis, Stefan Kitzler, Bernhard Haslhofer, Raphael Auer
Abstract
Total Value Locked (TVL) aims to measure the aggregate value of cryptoassets deposited in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocols. Although blockchain data is public, the way TVL is computed is not well understood. In practice, its calculation on major TVL aggregators relies on self-reports from community members and lacks standardization, making it difficult to verify published figures independently. We thus conduct a systematic study on 939 DeFi projects deployed in Ethereum. We study the methodologies used to compute TVL, examine factors hindering verifiability, and ultimately propose standardization attempts in the field. We find that 10.5% of the protocols rely on external servers; 68 methods alternative to standard balance queries exist, although their use decreased over time; and 240 equal balance queries are repeated on multiple protocols. These findings indicate limits to verifiability and transparency. We thus introduce ``verifiable Total Value Locked’’ (vTVL), a metric measuring the TVL that can be verified relying solely on on-chain data and standard balance queries. A case study on 400 protocols shows that our estimations align with published figures for 46.5% of protocols. Informed by these findings, we discuss design guidelines that could facilitate a more verifiable, standardized, and explainable TVL computation.
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 3.0/10
- Empirical Rigor: 7.5/10
- Quadrant: Street Traders — practical and empirical, lighter on theory
Why this score: The paper addresses a critical gap in DeFi infrastructure by providing a rigorous empirical assessment of TVL verifiability across 939 Ethereum protocols. While mathematically lightweight, it introduces a novel framework (vTVL) and metric (Discrepancy Ratio), supported by open-source code and clear standardization guidelines.
Research Flowchart
flowchart TD
A["Research Goal: Assess TVL Verifiability & Standardization in DeFi"] --> B["Data Collection: 939 Ethereum DeFi Protocols & Aggregator Methodologies"]
B --> C["Systematic Analysis: Evaluate Off-chain Dependencies & Calculation Methods"]
C --> D["Key Findings: 10.5% use external servers, 68 non-standard methods, 240 repeated queries"]
D --> E["Propose Metric: Verifiable TVL (vTVL) using only standard on-chain queries"]
E --> F["Validation & Outcome: Case study on 400 protocols aligns with published TVL for 46.5%"]
Cited References (77)
- DeFiLlama website
- DeFi Rankings
- DeFiPulse Total Value Locked (TVL) Methodology
- Frequently Asked Questions
- What Total Value Locked (Tvl) and Why Users Monitor This Metric
- Total Value Locked (TVL) in DeFi protocols
- Master of Anons: How a Crypto Developer Faked a DeFi Ecosystem
- Understanding Total Value Locked (TVL) (2021)
and 69 more
- Data Provider DeFiLlama De-emphasizes Double-Counted Crypto Deposits After Saber Revelation (2022)
- Piercing the Veil of TVL: DeFi Reappraised (2025)
- Defi lending during the merge — → 2303.08748
- Sok: Decentralized exchanges (dex) with automated market maker (amm) protocols (2023)
- Defi protocols for loanable funds: Interest rates, liquidity and market efficiency (2020)
- Decentralized finance: On blockchain-and smart contract-based financial markets (2021)
- Sok: Yield aggregators in defi (2022)
- Leverage staking with liquid staking derivatives (lsds): Opportunities and risks — → 2401.08610
- Disentangling decentralized finance (DeFi) compositions (2023)
- DeFi composability as MEV non-interference (2023) — link
- A short survey on business models of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols (2022)
- The technology of decentralized finance (DeFi) (2024)
- A Survey on Ethereum Systems Security: Vulnerabilities, Attacks, and Defenses (2020) — link
- SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Attacks (2022) — link
- Sok: Decentralized finance (defi) (2021) — link
- Detecting token systems on ethereum (2019)
- Identification of token contracts on Ethereum: standard compliance and beyond (2023)
- SoK: A classification framework for stablecoin designs (2020)
- Analyzing voting power in decentralized governance: Who controls DAOs? (2024)
- Transparency report
- An empirical study of defi liquidations: Incentives, risks, and instabilities (2021)
- Why we don’t accept APIs
- Our methodology
- GitHub repository - DeFiLlama-Adapters
- Mock Service Worker - interceptor
- Address clustering heuristics for Ethereum (2020)
- Behavior of liquidity providers in decentralized exchanges (2021) — link
- APIs
- Ethereum Signature Database
- Documentation
- Top Crypto Categories By Market Cap
- Cryptocurrency Sectors by 24h Price Change
- Sok: Decentralized finance (defi) attacks (2023)
- Analysis Model for Decentralized Lending Protocols (2022)
- Cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (DeFi) (2022)
- Impact of social metrics in decentralized finance (2023)
- Sok: Oracles from the ground truth to market manipulation (2021)
- Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem (2018)
- Defiranger: Detecting price manipulation attacks on defi applications (2021) — link
- Embedded Supervision : How to Build Regulation Into Decentralized Finance (2022) — link
- Stablecoin Devaluation Risk (2023)
- Blockchain privacy and regulatory compliance: Towards a practical equilibrium (2024)
- Assessing the solvency of virtual asset service providers: are current standards sufficient? (2024)
- Review of decentralized finance applications and their total value locked (2021)
- Defi-ning defi: Challenges & pathway (2021)
- Understanding digital bubbles amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from DeFi and NFTs (2022)
- Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Projects: A Study of Key Performance Indicators in Terms of DeFi Protocols’ Valuations (2022)
- Return Factors of Ether Cryptocurrency: On Chain Metrics and Defi
- Decentralized finance: the possibilities of a blockchain “money lego” system (2021)
- The return of (I) DeFiX (2022) — link
- Where Do DeFi Stablecoins Go? A Closer Look at What DeFi Composability Really Means (2021)
- Decentralized finance, centralized ownership? an iterative mapping process to measure protocol token distribution (2022)
- Measuring asset composability as a proxy for DeFi integration (2021)
- Understanding DeFi Through the Lens of a Production-Network Model (2023)
- Towards understanding governance tokens in liquidity mining: a case study of decentralized exchanges (2022)
- From code to market: Network of developers and correlated returns of cryptocurrencies (2020)
- Measurements, analyses, and insights on the entire ethereum blockchain network (2020)
- Power-law distributions in empirical data (2009)
- Scale-free networks are rare (2019)
- ERC-20: Token Standard Improvement Proposal
- Ethereum JSON-RPC API
- Functionalities documentation
- Factory contract documentation
- AaveV2Provider contract
- Vyper contract
- DeFi protocol risks: The paradox of DeFi (2021)
- Decentralized crypto governance? transparency and concentration in ethereum decision-making (2024)
- The governance of decentralized autonomous organizations: A study of contributors’ influence, networks, and shifts in voting power (2024)
- DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion (2021)
2 of 77 cited works are in the corpus; resolved via arXiv source bundles, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Corpus-wide: 2518 linked papers.