Understanding Modern Portfolio Construction
ArXiv ID: ssrn-2740027 “View on arXiv”
Authors: Unknown
Abstract
No abstract found
Keywords: Unknown
Complexity vs Empirical Score
- Math Complexity: 2.5/10
- Empirical Rigor: 1.0/10
- Quadrant: Philosophers
- Why: The paper reviews historical finance theory (MPT, CAPM, Fama-French) with minimal advanced math, focusing on conceptual discussion rather than new derivations or models. It lacks any backtests, datasets, or implementation details, serving primarily as a theoretical critique and framework proposal without empirical validation.
flowchart TD
A["Research Goal:<br>Understand Modern<br>Portfolio Construction"] --> B["Methodology:<br>Review Empirical<br>Asset Pricing Literature"]
B --> C["Data Input:<br>Historical Asset<br>Returns & Factors"]
C --> D["Computational Process:<br>Estimate Risk &<br>Optimize Weights"]
D --> E["Key Finding:<br>Traditional 60/40<br>Portfolio Underperforms"]
E --> F["Outcome:<br>Recommend Dynamic<br>Risk Parity Approach"]