Statistical arbitrage research clusters into a few durable questions: how to find related instruments, how to model the spread, how to time entries, and how to survive the strategy’s known decay. This map organizes the archive’s stat-arb papers along those lines, ranked by our rigor-weighted score. Read it with the stat-arb evaluation lens: the classic distance method famously decayed post-2000s, so sample period is the first thing to check in every branch below.

  flowchart TD
  ROOT["Statistical-Arbitrage Research<br>93 papers"]
  ROOT --> S0["Pairs & cointegration<br>26 papers"]
  ROOT --> S1["Mean-reversion signals<br>45 papers"]
  ROOT --> S2["ML-driven stat arb<br>8 papers"]
  ROOT --> S3["Crypto & cross-venue<br>4 papers"]
  ROOT --> S4["Execution & capacity<br>2 papers"]

93 papers mapped · ranked by rigor-weighted score · regenerated automatically as the daily pipeline scores new papers.

Pairs & cointegration

The classical core: finding and modeling co-moving pairs.

Mean-reversion signals

Spread construction and reversion timing beyond simple pairs.

ML-driven stat arb

Learned similarity, embeddings, and nonlinear spread models.

Crypto & cross-venue

Stat arb where the venues are the anomaly.

Execution & capacity

Turning spreads into fills without eating the edge.


Evaluation lens for this field: see the guides index · Full hub: /topics/statistical-arbitrage/