false

The Endogenous Constraint: Hysteresis, Stagflation, and the Structural Inhibition of Monetary Velocity in the Bitcoin Network (2016-2025)

The Endogenous Constraint: Hysteresis, Stagflation, and the Structural Inhibition of Monetary Velocity in the Bitcoin Network (2016-2025) ArXiv ID: 2512.07886 “View on arXiv” Authors: Hamoon Soleimani Abstract Bitcoin operates as a macroeconomic paradox: it combines a strictly predetermined, inelastic monetary issuance schedule with a stochastic, highly elastic demand for scarce block space. This paper empirically validates the Endogenous Constraint Hypothesis, positing that protocol-level throughput limits generate a non-linear negative feedback loop between network friction and base-layer monetary velocity. Using a verified Transaction Cost Index (TCI) derived from Blockchain.com on-chain data and Hansen’s (2000) threshold regression, we identify a definitive structural break at the 90th percentile of friction (TCI ~ 1.63). The analysis reveals a bifurcation in network utility: while the network exhibits robust velocity growth of +15.44% during normal regimes, this collapses to +6.06% during shock regimes, yielding a statistically significant Net Utility Contraction of -9.39% (p = 0.012). Crucially, Instrumental Variable (IV) tests utilizing Hashrate Variation as a supply-side instrument fail to detect a significant relationship in a linear specification (p=0.196), confirming that the velocity constraint is strictly a regime-switching phenomenon rather than a continuous linear function. Furthermore, we document a “Crypto Multiplier” inversion: high friction correlates with a +8.03% increase in capital concentration per entity, suggesting that congestion forces a substitution from active velocity to speculative hoarding. ...

November 30, 2025 · 2 min · Research Team

Multifractality and sample size influence on Bitcoin volatility patterns

Multifractality and sample size influence on Bitcoin volatility patterns ArXiv ID: 2511.03314 “View on arXiv” Authors: Tetsuya Takaishi Abstract The finite sample effect on the Hurst exponent (HE) of realized volatility time series is examined using Bitcoin data. This study finds that the HE decreases as the sampling period $Δ$ increases and a simple finite sample ansatz closely fits the HE data. We obtain values of the HE as $Δ\rightarrow 0$, which are smaller than 1/2, indicating rough volatility. The relative error is found to be $1%$ for the widely used five-minute realized volatility. Performing a multifractal analysis, we find the multifractality in the realized volatility time series, smaller than that of the price-return time series. ...

November 5, 2025 · 2 min · Research Team

Technical Analysis Meets Machine Learning: Bitcoin Evidence

Technical Analysis Meets Machine Learning: Bitcoin Evidence ArXiv ID: 2511.00665 “View on arXiv” Authors: José Ángel Islas Anguiano, Andrés García-Medina Abstract In this note, we compare Bitcoin trading performance using two machine learning models-Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-and two technical analysis-based strategies: Exponential Moving Average (EMA) crossover and a combination of Moving Average Convergence/Divergence with the Average Directional Index (MACD+ADX). The objective is to evaluate how trading signals can be used to maximize profits in the Bitcoin market. This comparison was motivated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approval of the first spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on 2024-01-10. Our results show that the LSTM model achieved a cumulative return of approximately 65.23% in under a year, significantly outperforming LightGBM, the EMA and MACD+ADX strategies, as well as the baseline buy-and-hold. This study highlights the potential for deeper integration of machine learning and technical analysis in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency landscape. ...

November 1, 2025 · 2 min · Research Team

Multifractality in Bitcoin Realised Volatility: Implications for Rough Volatility Modelling

Multifractality in Bitcoin Realised Volatility: Implications for Rough Volatility Modelling ArXiv ID: 2507.00575 “View on arXiv” Authors: Milan Pontiggia Abstract We assess the applicability of rough volatility models to Bitcoin realized volatility using the normalised p-variation framework of Cont and Das (2024). Applying this model-free estimator to high-frequency Bitcoin data from 2017 to 2024 across multiple sampling resolutions, we find that the normalised statistic remains strictly negative, precluding the estimation of a valid roughness index. Stationarity tests and robustness checks reveal no significant evidence of non-stationarity or structural breaks as explanatory factors. Instead, convergent evidence from three complementary diagnostics, namely Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis, log-log moment scaling, and wavelet leaders, reveals a multifractal structure in Bitcoin volatility. This behaviour violates the homogeneity assumptions underlying rough volatility estimation and accounts for the estimator’s systematic failure. These findings suggest that while rough volatility models perform well in traditional markets, they are structurally misaligned with the empirical features of Bitcoin volatility. ...

July 1, 2025 · 2 min · Research Team

Comparing Bitcoin and Ethereum tail behavior via Q-Q analysis of cryptocurrency returns

Comparing Bitcoin and Ethereum tail behavior via Q-Q analysis of cryptocurrency returns ArXiv ID: 2507.01983 “View on arXiv” Authors: A. H. Nzokem Abstract The cryptocurrency market presents both significant investment opportunities and higher risks relative to traditional financial assets. This study examines the tail behavior of daily returns for two leading cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin and Ethereum, using seven-parameter estimates from prior research, which applied the Generalized Tempered Stable (GTS) distribution. Quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots against the Normal distribution reveal that both assets exhibit heavy-tailed return distributions. However, Ethereum consistently shows a greater frequency of extreme values than would be expected under its Bitcoin-modeled counterpart, indicating more pronounced tail risk. ...

June 26, 2025 · 2 min · Research Team

Informer in Algorithmic Investment Strategies on High Frequency Bitcoin Data

Informer in Algorithmic Investment Strategies on High Frequency Bitcoin Data ArXiv ID: 2503.18096 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract The article investigates the usage of Informer architecture for building automated trading strategies for high frequency Bitcoin data. Three strategies using Informer model with different loss functions: Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Generalized Mean Absolute Directional Loss (GMADL) and Quantile loss, are proposed and evaluated against the Buy and Hold benchmark and two benchmark strategies based on technical indicators. The evaluation is conducted using data of various frequencies: 5 minute, 15 minute, and 30 minute intervals, over the 6 different periods. Although the Informer-based model with Quantile loss did not outperform the benchmark, two other models achieved better results. The performance of the model using RMSE loss worsens when used with higher frequency data while the model that uses novel GMADL loss function is benefiting from higher frequency data and when trained on 5 minute interval it beat all the other strategies on most of the testing periods. The primary contribution of this study is the application and assessment of the RMSE, GMADL, and Quantile loss functions with the Informer model to forecast future returns, subsequently using these forecasts to develop automated trading strategies. The research provides evidence that employing an Informer model trained with the GMADL loss function can result in superior trading outcomes compared to the buy-and-hold approach. ...

March 23, 2025 · 2 min · Research Team

Institutional Adoption and Correlation Dynamics: Bitcoin's Evolving Role in Financial Markets

Institutional Adoption and Correlation Dynamics: Bitcoin’s Evolving Role in Financial Markets ArXiv ID: 2501.09911 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Bitcoin, widely recognized as the first cryptocurrency, has shown increasing integration with traditional financial markets, particularly major U.S. equity indices, amid accelerating institutional adoption. This study examines how Bitcoin exchange-traded funds and corporate Bitcoin holdings affect correlations with the Nasdaq 100 and the S&P 500, using rolling-window correlation, static correlation coefficients, and an event-study framework on daily data from 2018 to 2025.Correlation levels intensified following key institutional milestones, with peaks reaching 0.87 in 2024, and they vary across market regimes. These trends suggest that Bitcoin has transitioned from an alternative asset toward a more integrated financial instrument, carrying implications for portfolio diversification, risk management, and systemic stability. Future research should further investigate regulatory and macroeconomic factors shaping these evolving relationships. ...

January 17, 2025 · 2 min · Research Team

The Intraday Bitcoin Response to Tether Minting and Burning Events: Asymmetry, Investor Sentiment, And Whale Alerts On Twitter

The Intraday Bitcoin Response to Tether Minting and Burning Events: Asymmetry, Investor Sentiment, And “Whale Alerts” On Twitter ArXiv ID: 2501.05232 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Tether Limited has the sole authority to create (mint) and destroy (burn) Tether stablecoins (USDT). This paper investigates Bitcoin’s response to USDT supply change events between 2014 and 2021 and identifies an interesting asymmetry between Bitcoin’s responses to USDT minting and burning events. Bitcoin responds positively to USDT minting events over 5- to 30-minute event windows, but this response begins declining after 60 minutes. State-dependence is also demonstrated, with Bitcoin prices exhibiting a greater increase when the corresponding USDT minting event coincides with positive investor sentiment and is announced to the public by data service provider, Whale Alert, on Twitter. ...

January 9, 2025 · 2 min · Research Team

A Full-History Network Dataset for BTC Asset Decentralization Profiling

A Full-History Network Dataset for BTC Asset Decentralization Profiling ArXiv ID: 2411.13603 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Since its advent in 2009, Bitcoin (BTC) has garnered increasing attention from both academia and industry. However, due to the massive transaction volume, no systematic study has quantitatively measured the asset decentralization degree specifically from a network perspective. In this paper, by conducting a thorough analysis of the BTC transaction network, we first address the significant gap in the availability of full-history BTC graph and network property dataset, which spans over 15 years from the genesis block (1st March, 2009) to the 845651-th block (29, May 2024). We then present the first systematic investigation to profile BTC’s asset decentralization and design several decentralization degrees for quantification. Through extensive experiments, we emphasize the significant role of network properties and our network-based decentralization degree in enhancing Bitcoin analysis. Our findings demonstrate the importance of our comprehensive dataset and analysis in advancing research on Bitcoin’s transaction dynamics and decentralization, providing valuable insights into the network’s structure and its implications. ...

November 19, 2024 · 2 min · Research Team

An empirical study of market risk factors for Bitcoin

An empirical study of market risk factors for Bitcoin ArXiv ID: 2406.19401 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract The study examines whether fama-french equity factors can effectively explain the idiosyncratic risk and return characteristics of Bitcoin. By incorporating Fama-french factors, the explanatory power of these factors on Bitcoin’s excess returns over various moving average periods is tested through applications of several statistical methods. The analysis aims to determine if equity market factors are significant in explaining and modeling systemic risk in Bitcoin. ...

May 24, 2024 · 1 min · Research Team