Concentrated Liquidity

Automated Market Makers: A Stochastic Optimization Approach for Profitable Liquidity Concentration ArXiv ID: 2504.16542 “View on arXiv” Authors: Simon Caspar Zeller, Paul-Niklas Ken Kandora, Daniel Kirste, Niclas Kannengießer, Steffen Rebennack, Ali Sunyaev Abstract Concentrated liquidity automated market makers (AMMs), such as Uniswap v3, enable liquidity providers (LPs) to earn liquidity rewards by depositing tokens into liquidity pools. However, LPs often face significant financial losses driven by poorly selected liquidity provision intervals and high costs associated with frequent liquidity reallocation. To support LPs in achieving more profitable liquidity concentration, we developed a tractable stochastic optimization problem that can be used to compute optimal liquidity provision intervals for profitable liquidity provision. The developed problem accounts for the relationships between liquidity rewards, divergence loss, and reallocation costs. By formalizing optimal liquidity provision as a tractable stochastic optimization problem, we support a better understanding of the relationship between liquidity rewards, divergence loss, and reallocation costs. Moreover, the stochastic optimization problem offers a foundation for more profitable liquidity concentration. ...

Improving DeFi Accessibility through Efficient Liquidity Provisioning with Deep Reinforcement Learning ArXiv ID: 2501.07508 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract This paper applies deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to optimize liquidity provisioning in Uniswap v3, a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol implementing an automated market maker (AMM) model with concentrated liquidity. We model the liquidity provision task as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and train an active liquidity provider (LP) agent using the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. The agent dynamically adjusts liquidity positions by using information about price dynamics to balance fee maximization and impermanent loss mitigation. We use a rolling window approach for training and testing, reflecting realistic market conditions and regime shifts. This study compares the data-driven performance of the DRL-based strategy against common heuristics adopted by small retail LP actors that do not systematically modify their liquidity positions. By promoting more efficient liquidity management, this work aims to make DeFi markets more accessible and inclusive for a broader range of participants. Through a data-driven approach to liquidity management, this work seeks to contribute to the ongoing development of more efficient and user-friendly DeFi markets. ...

What Drives Liquidity on Decentralized Exchanges? Evidence from the Uniswap Protocol ArXiv ID: 2410.19107 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract We study liquidity on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), identifying factors at the platform, blockchain, token pair, and liquidity pool levels with predictive power for market depth metrics. We introduce the v2 counterfactual spread metric, a novel criterion which assesses the degree of liquidity concentration in pools using the ``concentrated liquidity’’ mechanism, allowing us to decompose the effect of a factor on market depth into two channels: total value locked (TVL) and concentration. We further explore how external liquidity from competing DEXs and private inventory on DEX aggregators influence market depth. We find that (i) gas prices, returns, and a DEX’s share of trading volume affect liquidity through concentration, (ii) internalization of order flow by private market makers affects TVL but not the overall market depth, and (iii) volatility, fee revenue, and markout affect liquidity through both channels. ...

Concentrated Liquidity with Leverage ArXiv ID: 2409.12803 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Concentrated liquidity (CL) provisioning is a way how to improve the capital efficiency of Automated Market Makers (AMM). Allowing liquidity providers to use leverage is a step towards even higher capital efficiency. A number of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocols implement this technique in conjunction with overcollateralized lending. However, the properties of leveraged CL positions have not been formalized and are poorly understood in practice. This article describes the principles of a leveraged CL provisioning protocol, formally models the notions of margin level, assets, and debt, and proves that within this model, leveraged LP positions possess several properties that make them safe to use. ...

Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Predictable Loss and Optimal Liquidity Provision ArXiv ID: 2309.08431 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Constant product markets with concentrated liquidity (CL) are the most popular type of automated market makers. In this paper, we characterise the continuous-time wealth dynamics of strategic LPs who dynamically adjust their range of liquidity provision in CL pools. Their wealth results from fee income, the value of their holdings in the pool, and rebalancing costs. Next, we derive a self-financing and closed-form optimal liquidity provision strategy where the width of the LP’s liquidity range is determined by the profitability of the pool (provision fees minus gas fees), the predictable losses (PL) of the LP’s position, and concentration risk. Concentration risk refers to the decrease in fee revenue if the marginal exchange rate (akin to the midprice in a limit order book) in the pool exits the LP’s range of liquidity. When the drift in the marginal rate is stochastic, we show how to optimally skew the range of liquidity to increase fee revenue and profit from the expected changes in the marginal rate. Finally, we use Uniswap v3 data to show that, on average, LPs have traded at a significant loss, and to show that the out-of-sample performance of our strategy is superior to the historical performance of LPs in the pool we consider. ...