false

Leveraging Fundamental Analysis for Stock Trend Prediction for Profit

Leveraging Fundamental Analysis for Stock Trend Prediction for Profit ArXiv ID: 2410.03913 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract This paper investigates the application of machine learning models, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (1D CNN), and Logistic Regression (LR), for predicting stock trends based on fundamental analysis. Unlike most existing studies that predominantly utilize technical or sentiment analysis, we emphasize the use of a company’s financial statements and intrinsic value for trend forecasting. Using a dataset of 269 data points from publicly traded companies across various sectors from 2019 to 2023, we employ key financial ratios and the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model to formulate two prediction tasks: Annual Stock Price Difference (ASPD) and Difference between Current Stock Price and Intrinsic Value (DCSPIV). These tasks assess the likelihood of annual profit and current profitability, respectively. Our results demonstrate that LR models outperform CNN and LSTM models, achieving an average test accuracy of 74.66% for ASPD and 72.85% for DCSPIV. This study contributes to the limited literature on integrating fundamental analysis into machine learning for stock prediction, offering valuable insights for both academic research and practical investment strategies. By leveraging fundamental data, our approach highlights the potential for long-term stock trend prediction, supporting portfolio managers in their decision-making processes. ...

October 4, 2024 · 2 min · Research Team

Time Value of Money

Time Value of Money ArXiv ID: ssrn-882850 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract This is a course material from the book Investment Decision Making. For Firm and Project Valuation. The book is originally in Spanish and is untitled as Decisio Keywords: Project Valuation, Capital Budgeting, Firm Valuation, Investment Decision Making, Discounted Cash Flow, Corporate Finance Complexity vs Empirical Score Math Complexity: 3.0/10 Empirical Rigor: 1.0/10 Quadrant: Philosophers Why: The text is course material on a foundational financial concept, focusing on conceptual explanation rather than advanced mathematics or empirical backtesting. There is no code, data, or implementation details provided. flowchart TD A["Research Goal:<br>Time Value of Money Application"] --> B["Methodology:<br>Discounted Cash Flow Analysis"] B --> C{"Data Inputs:<br>CF, Rate, Time Period"} C --> D["Computational Process:<br>Net Present Value Calculation"] D --> E{"Decision Rule:<br>NPV >= 0?"} E -- Yes --> F["Outcome:<br>Project Accepted"] E -- No --> G["Outcome:<br>Project Rejected"] F --> H["Key Finding:<br>Value Creation through<br>Investment Selection"] G --> H

February 14, 2006 · 1 min · Research Team