Fourier Inversion (IFT)

Fast reliable pricing and calibration of the rough Heston model ArXiv ID: 2508.15080 “View on arXiv” Authors: Svetlana Boyarchenko, Marco de Innocentis, Sergei Levendorskiĭ Abstract The paper is an extended and modified version of the preprint S.Boyarchenko and S.Levendorskiĭ Correct implied volatility shapes and reliable pricing in the rough Heston model". We combine a modification of the Adams method with the SINH-acceleration method S.Boyarchenko and S.Levendorskii (IJTAF 2019, v.22) of Fourier inversion (iFT) to price vanilla options under the rough Heston model. For moderate or long maturities and strikes near spot, thousands of prices are computed in several milliseconds (ms) in Matlab on a Mac with moderate specs, with relative errors $\lesssim 10^{"-4"}$. Even for options close to expiry and far-OTM, the pricing takes a few tens or hundreds of ms. We show that, for the calibrated parameters in El Euch and Rosenbaum (Math.Finance 2019, v.29), the model implied vol surface is much flatter and fits the market data poorly; thus the calibration in op.cit. is a case of ghost calibration’’ (M.Boyarchenko and S.Levendorskiĭ, Quant. Finance 2015, v.15): numerical error and model specification error offset each other, creating an apparently good fit that vanishes when a more accurate pricer is used. We explain how such errors arise in popular iFT implementations that use fixed numerical parameters, yielding spurious smiles/skews, and provide numerical evidence that SINH acceleration is faster and more accurate than competing methods. Robust error control is ensured by a general Conformal Bootstrap principle that we formulate; the principle is applicable to many Fourier-pricing methods. We outline how this principle and our method enable accurate calibration procedures that are hundreds of times faster than approaches commonly used in the industry. Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are those of the authors only. No other representation should be attributed. ...

Correct implied volatility shapes and reliable pricing in the rough Heston model ArXiv ID: 2412.16067 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract We use modifications of the Adams method and very fast and accurate sinh-acceleration method of the Fourier inversion (iFT) (S.Boyarchenko and Levendorskiĭ, IJTAF 2019, v.22) to evaluate prices of vanilla options; for options of moderate and long maturities and strikes not very far from the spot, thousands of prices can be calculated in several msec. with relative errors of the order of 0.5% and smaller running Matlab on a Mac with moderate characteristics. We demonstrate that for the calibrated set of parameters in Euch and Rosenbaum, Math. Finance 2019, v. 29, the correct implied volatility surface is significantly flatter and fits the data very poorly, hence, the calibration results in op.cit. is an example of the {"\em ghost calibration"} (M.Boyarchenko and Levendorkiĭ, Quantitative Finance 2015, v. 15): the errors of the model and numerical method almost cancel one another. We explain how calibration errors of this sort are generated by each of popular versions of numerical realizations of iFT (Carr-Madan, Lipton-Lewis and COS methods) with prefixed parameters of a numerical method, resulting in spurious volatility smiles and skews. We suggest a general {"\em Conformal Bootstrap principle"} which allows one to avoid ghost calibration errors. We outline schemes of application of Conformal Bootstrap principle and the method of the paper to the design of accurate and fast calibration procedures. ...