Hierarchical Risk Parity

Hierarchical Minimum Variance Portfolios: A Theoretical and Algorithmic Approach ArXiv ID: 2503.12328 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract We introduce a novel approach to portfolio optimization that leverages hierarchical graph structures and the Schur complement method to systematically reduce computational complexity while preserving full covariance information. Inspired by Lopez de Prados hierarchical risk parity and Cottons Schur complement methods, our framework models the covariance matrix as an adjacency-like structure of a hierarchical graph. We demonstrate that portfolio optimization can be recursively reduced across hierarchical levels, allowing optimal weights to be computed efficiently by inverting only small submatrices regardless of portfolio size. Moreover, we translate our results into a recursive algorithm that constructs optimal portfolio allocations. Our results reveal a transparent and mathematically rigorous connection between classical Markowitz mean-variance optimization, hierarchical clustering, and the Schur complement method. ...

High-dimensional covariance matrix estimators on simulated portfolios with complex structures ArXiv ID: 2412.08756 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract We study the allocation of synthetic portfolios under hierarchical nested, one-factor, and diagonal structures of the population covariance matrix in a high-dimensional scenario. The noise reduction approaches for the sample realizations are based on random matrices, free probability, deterministic equivalents, and their combination with a data science hierarchical method known as two-step covariance estimators. The financial performance metrics from the simulations are compared with empirical data from companies comprising the S&P 500 index using a moving window and walk-forward analysis. The portfolio allocation strategies analyzed include the minimum variance portfolio (both with and without short-selling constraints) and the hierarchical risk parity approach. Our proposed hierarchical nested covariance model shows signatures of complex system interactions. The empirical financial data reproduces stylized portfolio facts observed in the complex and one-factor covariance models. The two-step estimators proposed here improve several financial metrics under the analyzed investment strategies. The results pave the way for new risk management and diversification approaches when the number of assets is of the same order as the number of transaction days in the investment portfolio. ...

Schur Complementary Allocation: A Unification of Hierarchical Risk Parity and Minimum Variance Portfolios ArXiv ID: 2411.05807 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Despite many attempts to make optimization-based portfolio construction in the spirit of Markowitz robust and approachable, it is far from universally adopted. Meanwhile, the collection of more heuristic divide-and-conquer approaches was revitalized by Lopez de Prado where Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) was introduced. This paper reveals the hidden connection between these seemingly disparate approaches. ...

Portfolio Optimization: A Comparative Study ArXiv ID: 2307.05048 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Portfolio optimization has been an area that has attracted considerable attention from the financial research community. Designing a profitable portfolio is a challenging task involving precise forecasting of future stock returns and risks. This chapter presents a comparative study of three portfolio design approaches, the mean-variance portfolio (MVP), hierarchical risk parity (HRP)-based portfolio, and autoencoder-based portfolio. These three approaches to portfolio design are applied to the historical prices of stocks chosen from ten thematic sectors listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India. The portfolios are designed using the stock price data from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, and their performances are tested on the out-of-sample data from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. Extensive results are analyzed on the performance of the portfolios. It is observed that the performance of the MVP portfolio is the best on the out-of-sample data for the risk-adjusted returns. However, the autoencoder portfolios outperformed their counterparts on annual returns. ...