false

All that Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors

All that Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors ArXiv ID: ssrn-1151595 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract We test and confirm the hypothesis that individual investors are net buyers of attention-grabbing stocks, e.g., stocks in the news, stocks experiencing high abn Keywords: Investor attention, Behavioral finance, Market microstructure, Trading behavior, Information asymmetry, Equities Complexity vs Empirical Score Math Complexity: 2.5/10 Empirical Rigor: 8.0/10 Quadrant: Street Traders Why: The paper focuses on empirical testing of a behavioral hypothesis using event studies and regressions on large-scale trading datasets, requiring significant data processing and backtesting but relying on relatively straightforward statistical models. flowchart TD A["Research Goal<br/>Test if individual investors<br/>are net buyers of<br/>attention-grabbing stocks"] --> B["Methodology<br/>Event Study & Regression Analysis"] B --> C["Data Inputs<br/>Daily Trades (TAQ) &<br/>News Data (Reuters)"] C --> D["Computation<br/>Calculate Abnormal Attention<br/>(News/High Volume)<br/>and Net Buying Imbalance"] D --> E{"Key Findings"} E --> F["Individuals: Net Buyers<br/>of high-attention stocks"] E --> G["Institutions: Net Sellers<br/>or no consistent effect"] E --> H["Outcome: Attention-driven<br/>demand creates temporary<br/>price pressure"]

June 26, 2008 · 1 min · Research Team

All that Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors

All that Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors ArXiv ID: ssrn-460660 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract We test and confirm the hypothesis that individual investors are net buyers of attention-grabbing stocks, e.g., stocks in the news, stocks experiencing high abn Keywords: Investor attention, Behavioral finance, Market microstructure, Trading behavior, Information asymmetry, Equities Complexity vs Empirical Score Math Complexity: 2.5/10 Empirical Rigor: 9.0/10 Quadrant: Street Traders Why: The paper uses basic statistical comparisons (t-tests, regressions) but focuses heavily on real-world brokerage data analysis, multiple attention proxies, and robustness checks, making it highly empirical and implementable for trading strategies. flowchart TD A["Research Goal:<br/>Does investor attention drive buying<br/>behavior, especially for individuals?"] --> B["Data & Inputs"] B --> C["Methodology"] C --> D["Computational Processes"] D --> E["Key Findings/Outcomes"] B --> B1["Daily Stock & Trading Data<br/>e.g., CRSP/TAQ"] B --> B2["Attention Proxies<br/>News mentions & Abnormal volume"] B --> B3["Investor Classification<br/>Individual vs. Institutional"] C --> C1["Event Study Design<br/>Focus on high-attention days"] C --> C2["Regression Analysis<br/>Trading volume vs. attention"] D --> D1["Net Buy Calculation<br/>Aggregate flows by investor type"] D --> D2["Control for Fundamentals<br/>Liquidity, Returns, Volatility"] E --> F1["Confirmation: Individuals<br/>buy high-attention stocks"] E --> F2["Institutional Behavior<br/>Contrast or indifference"] E --> F3["Implication<br/>Attention-driven anomalies"]

June 20, 2005 · 1 min · Research Team