Large Language Models (LLMs)

Exploring the Synergy of Quantitative Factors and Newsflow Representations from Large Language Models for Stock Return Prediction ArXiv ID: 2510.15691 “View on arXiv” Authors: Tian Guo, Emmanuel Hauptmann Abstract In quantitative investing, return prediction supports various tasks, including stock selection, portfolio optimization, and risk management. Quantitative factors, such as valuation, quality, and growth, capture various characteristics of stocks. Unstructured data, like news and transcripts, has attracted growing attention, driven by recent advances in large language models (LLMs). This paper examines effective methods for leveraging multimodal factors and newsflow in return prediction and stock selection. First, we introduce a fusion learning framework to learn a unified representation from factors and newsflow representations generated by an LLM. Within this framework, we compare three methods of different architectural complexities: representation combination, representation summation, and attentive representations. Next, building on the limitation of fusion learning observed in empirical comparison, we explore the mixture model that adaptively combines predictions made by single modalities and their fusion. To mitigate the training instability of the mixture model, we introduce a decoupled training approach with theoretical insights. Finally, our experiments on real investment universes yield several insights into effective multimodal modeling of factors and news for stock return prediction and selection. ...

Comparing LLMs for Sentiment Analysis in Financial Market News ArXiv ID: 2510.15929 “View on arXiv” Authors: Lucas Eduardo Pereira Teles, Carlos M. S. Figueiredo Abstract This article presents a comparative study of large language models (LLMs) in the task of sentiment analysis of financial market news. This work aims to analyze the performance difference of these models in this important natural language processing task within the context of finance. LLM models are compared with classical approaches, allowing for the quantification of the benefits of each tested model or approach. Results show that large language models outperform classical models in the vast majority of cases. ...

Mamba Outpaces Reformer in Stock Prediction with Sentiments from Top Ten LLMs ArXiv ID: 2510.01203 “View on arXiv” Authors: Lokesh Antony Kadiyala, Amir Mirzaeinia Abstract The stock market is extremely difficult to predict in the short term due to high market volatility, changes caused by news, and the non-linear nature of the financial time series. This research proposes a novel framework for improving minute-level prediction accuracy using semantic sentiment scores from top ten different large language models (LLMs) combined with minute interval intraday stock price data. We systematically constructed a time-aligned dataset of AAPL news articles and 1-minute Apple Inc. (AAPL) stock prices for the dates of April 4 to May 2, 2025. The sentiment analysis was achieved using the DeepSeek-V3, GPT variants, LLaMA, Claude, Gemini, Qwen, and Mistral models through their APIs. Each article obtained sentiment scores from all ten LLMs, which were scaled to a [“0, 1”] range and combined with prices and technical indicators like RSI, ROC, and Bollinger Band Width. Two state-of-the-art such as Reformer and Mamba were trained separately on the dataset using the sentiment scores produced by each LLM as input. Hyper parameters were optimized by means of Optuna and were evaluated through a 3-day evaluation period. Reformer had mean squared error (MSE) or the evaluation metrics, and it should be noted that Mamba performed not only faster but also better than Reformer for every LLM across the 10 LLMs tested. Mamba performed best with LLaMA 3.3–70B, with the lowest error of 0.137. While Reformer could capture broader trends within the data, the model appeared to over smooth sudden changes by the LLMs. This study highlights the potential of integrating LLM-based semantic analysis paired with efficient temporal modeling to enhance real-time financial forecasting. ...

Trading-R1: Financial Trading with LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning ArXiv ID: 2509.11420 “View on arXiv” Authors: Yijia Xiao, Edward Sun, Tong Chen, Fang Wu, Di Luo, Wei Wang Abstract Developing professional, structured reasoning on par with human financial analysts and traders remains a central challenge in AI for finance, where markets demand interpretability and trust. Traditional time-series models lack explainability, while LLMs face challenges in turning natural-language analysis into disciplined, executable trades. Although reasoning LLMs have advanced in step-by-step planning and verification, their application to risk-sensitive financial decisions is underexplored. We present Trading-R1, a financially-aware model that incorporates strategic thinking and planning for comprehensive thesis composition, facts-grounded analysis, and volatility-adjusted decision making. Trading-R1 aligns reasoning with trading principles through supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with a three-stage easy-to-hard curriculum. Training uses Tauric-TR1-DB, a 100k-sample corpus spanning 18 months, 14 equities, and five heterogeneous financial data sources. Evaluated on six major equities and ETFs, Trading-R1 demonstrates improved risk-adjusted returns and lower drawdowns compared to both open-source and proprietary instruction-following models as well as reasoning models. The system generates structured, evidence-based investment theses that support disciplined and interpretable trading decisions. Trading-R1 Terminal will be released at https://github.com/TauricResearch/Trading-R1. ...

Bridging Human Cognition and AI: A Framework for Explainable Decision-Making Systems ArXiv ID: 2509.02388 “View on arXiv” Authors: N. Jean, G. Le Pera Abstract Explainability in AI and ML models is critical for fostering trust, ensuring accountability, and enabling informed decision making in high stakes domains. Yet this objective is often unmet in practice. This paper proposes a general purpose framework that bridges state of the art explainability techniques with Malle’s five category model of behavior explanation: Knowledge Structures, Simulation/Projection, Covariation, Direct Recall, and Rationalization. The framework is designed to be applicable across AI assisted decision making systems, with the goal of enhancing transparency, interpretability, and user trust. We demonstrate its practical relevance through real world case studies, including credit risk assessment and regulatory analysis powered by large language models (LLMs). By aligning technical explanations with human cognitive mechanisms, the framework lays the groundwork for more comprehensible, responsible, and ethical AI systems. ...

Adaptive Alpha Weighting with PPO: Enhancing Prompt-Based LLM-Generated Alphas in Quant Trading ArXiv ID: 2509.01393 “View on arXiv” Authors: Qizhao Chen, Hiroaki Kawashima Abstract This paper proposes a reinforcement learning framework that employs Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) to dynamically optimize the weights of multiple large language model (LLM)-generated formulaic alphas for stock trading strategies. Formulaic alphas are mathematically defined trading signals derived from price, volume, sentiment, and other data. Although recent studies have shown that LLMs can generate diverse and effective alphas, a critical challenge lies in how to adaptively integrate them under varying market conditions. To address this gap, we leverage the deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b model to generate fifty alphas for five major stocks: Apple, HSBC, Pepsi, Toyota, and Tencent, and then use PPO to adjust their weights in real time. Experimental results demonstrate that the PPO-optimized strategy achieves strong returns and high Sharpe ratios across most stocks, outperforming both an equal-weighted alpha portfolio and traditional benchmarks such as the Nikkei 225, S&P 500, and Hang Seng Index. The findings highlight the importance of reinforcement learning in the allocation of alpha weights and show the potential of combining LLM-generated signals with adaptive optimization for robust financial forecasting and trading. ...

Is All the Information in the Price? LLM Embeddings versus the EMH in Stock Clustering ArXiv ID: 2509.01590 “View on arXiv” Authors: Bingyang Wang, Grant Johnson, Maria Hybinette, Tucker Balch Abstract This paper investigates whether artificial intelligence can enhance stock clustering compared to traditional methods. We consider this in the context of the semi-strong Efficient Markets Hypothesis (EMH), which posits that prices fully reflect all public information and, accordingly, that clusters based on price information cannot be improved upon. We benchmark three clustering approaches: (i) price-based clusters derived from historical return correlations, (ii) human-informed clusters defined by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS), and (iii) AI-driven clusters constructed from large language model (LLM) embeddings of stock-related news headlines. At each date, each method provides a classification in which each stock is assigned to a cluster. To evaluate a clustering, we transform it into a synthetic factor model following the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) framework. This enables consistent evaluation of predictive performance in a roll forward, out-of-sample test. Using S&P 500 constituents from from 2022 through 2024, we find that price-based clustering consistently outperforms both rule-based and AI-based methods, reducing root mean squared error (RMSE) by 15.9% relative to GICS and 14.7% relative to LLM embeddings. Our contributions are threefold: (i) a generalizable methodology that converts any equity grouping: manual, machine, or market-driven, into a real-time factor model for evaluation; (ii) the first direct comparison of price-based, human rule-based, and AI-based clustering under identical conditions; and (iii) empirical evidence reinforcing that short-horizon return information is largely contained in prices. These results support the EMH while offering practitioners a practical diagnostic for monitoring evolving sector structures and provide academics a framework for testing alternative hypotheses about how quickly markets absorb information. ...

AlphaAgents: Large Language Model based Multi-Agents for Equity Portfolio Constructions ArXiv ID: 2508.11152 “View on arXiv” Authors: Tianjiao Zhao, Jingrao Lyu, Stokes Jones, Harrison Garber, Stefano Pasquali, Dhagash Mehta Abstract The field of artificial intelligence (AI) agents is evolving rapidly, driven by the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously perform and refine tasks with human-like efficiency and adaptability. In this context, multi-agent collaboration has emerged as a promising approach, enabling multiple AI agents to work together to solve complex challenges. This study investigates the application of role-based multi-agent systems to support stock selection in equity research and portfolio management. We present a comprehensive analysis performed by a team of specialized agents and evaluate their stock-picking performance against established benchmarks under varying levels of risk tolerance. Furthermore, we examine the advantages and limitations of employing multi-agent frameworks in equity analysis, offering critical insights into their practical efficacy and implementation challenges. ...

Can LLMs Identify Tax Abuse? ArXiv ID: 2508.20097 “View on arXiv” Authors: Andrew Blair-Stanek, Nils Holzenberger, Benjamin Van Durme Abstract We investigate whether large language models can discover and analyze U.S. tax-minimization strategies. This real-world domain challenges even seasoned human experts, and progress can reduce tax revenue lost from well-advised, wealthy taxpayers. We evaluate the most advanced LLMs on their ability to (1) interpret and verify tax strategies, (2) fill in gaps in partially specified strategies, and (3) generate complete, end-to-end strategies from scratch. This domain should be of particular interest to the LLM reasoning community: unlike synthetic challenge problems or scientific reasoning tasks, U.S. tax law involves navigating hundreds of thousands of pages of statutes, case law, and administrative guidance, all updated regularly. Notably, LLM-based reasoning identified an entirely novel tax strategy, highlighting these models’ potential to revolutionize tax agencies’ fight against tax abuse. ...

Event-Aware Sentiment Factors from LLM-Augmented Financial Tweets: A Transparent Framework for Interpretable Quant Trading ArXiv ID: 2508.07408 “View on arXiv” Authors: Yueyi Wang, Qiyao Wei Abstract In this study, we wish to showcase the unique utility of large language models (LLMs) in financial semantic annotation and alpha signal discovery. Leveraging a corpus of company-related tweets, we use an LLM to automatically assign multi-label event categories to high-sentiment-intensity tweets. We align these labeled sentiment signals with forward returns over 1-to-7-day horizons to evaluate their statistical efficacy and market tradability. Our experiments reveal that certain event labels consistently yield negative alpha, with Sharpe ratios as low as -0.38 and information coefficients exceeding 0.05, all statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. This study establishes the feasibility of transforming unstructured social media text into structured, multi-label event variables. A key contribution of this work is its commitment to transparency and reproducibility; all code and methodologies are made publicly available. Our results provide compelling evidence that social media sentiment is a valuable, albeit noisy, signal in financial forecasting and underscore the potential of open-source frameworks to democratize algorithmic trading research. ...