Market Regulation

“Centralized or Decentralized?”: Concerns and Value Judgments of Stakeholders in the Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) Market ArXiv ID: 2311.10990 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are decentralized digital tokens to represent the unique ownership of items. Recently, NFTs have been gaining popularity and at the same time bringing up issues, such as scams, racism, and sexism. Decentralization, a key attribute of NFT, contributes to some of the issues that are easier to regulate under centralized schemes, which are intentionally left out of the NFT marketplace. In this work, we delved into this centralization-decentralization dilemma in the NFT space through mixed quantitative and qualitative methods. Centralization-decentralization dilemma is the dilemma caused by the conflict between the slogan of decentralization and the interests of stakeholders. We first analyzed over 30,000 NFT-related tweets to obtain a high-level understanding of stakeholders’ concerns in the NFT space. We then interviewed 15 NFT stakeholders (both creators and collectors) to obtain their in-depth insights into these concerns and potential solutions. Our findings identify concerning issues among users: financial scams, counterfeit NFTs, hacking, and unethical NFTs. We further reflected on the centralization-decentralization dilemma drawing upon the perspectives of the stakeholders in the interviews. Finally, we gave some inferences to solve the centralization-decentralization dilemma in the NFT market and thought about the future of NFT and decentralization. ...

Comparing effects of price limit and circuit breaker in stock exchanges by an agent-based model ArXiv ID: 2309.10220 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract The prevention of rapidly and steeply falling market prices is vital to avoid financial crisis. To this end, some stock exchanges implement a price limit or a circuit breaker, and there has been intensive investigation into which regulation best prevents rapid and large variations in price. In this study, we examine this question using an artificial market model that is an agent-based model for a financial market. Our findings show that the price limit and the circuit breaker basically have the same effect when the parameters, limit price range and limit time range, are the same. However, the price limit is less effective when limit the time range is smaller than the cancel time range. With the price limit, many sell orders are accumulated around the lower limit price, and when the lower limit price is changed before the accumulated sell orders are cancelled, it leads to the accumulation of sell orders of various prices. These accumulated sell orders essentially act as a wall against buy orders, thereby preventing price from rising. Caution should be taken in the sense that these results pertain to a limited situation. Specifically, our finding that the circuit breaker is better than the price limit should be adapted only in cases where the reason for falling prices is erroneous orders and when individual stocks are regulated. ...

Deep Reinforcement Learning for ESG financial portfolio management ArXiv ID: 2307.09631 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract This paper investigates the application of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) for Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) financial portfolio management, with a specific focus on the potential benefits of ESG score-based market regulation. We leveraged an Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C) agent and conducted our experiments using environments encoded within the OpenAI Gym, adapted from the FinRL platform. The study includes a comparative analysis of DRL agent performance under standard Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) market conditions and a scenario where returns are regulated in line with company ESG scores. In the ESG-regulated market, grants were proportionally allotted to portfolios based on their returns and ESG scores, while taxes were assigned to portfolios below the mean ESG score of the index. The results intriguingly reveal that the DRL agent within the ESG-regulated market outperforms the standard DJIA market setup. Furthermore, we considered the inclusion of ESG variables in the agent state space, and compared this with scenarios where such data were excluded. This comparison adds to the understanding of the role of ESG factors in portfolio management decision-making. We also analyze the behaviour of the DRL agent in IBEX 35 and NASDAQ-100 indexes. Both the A2C and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithms were applied to these additional markets, providing a broader perspective on the generalization of our findings. This work contributes to the evolving field of ESG investing, suggesting that market regulation based on ESG scoring can potentially improve DRL-based portfolio management, with significant implications for sustainable investing strategies. ...

Abnormal Trading Detection in the NFT Market ArXiv ID: 2306.04643 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract The Non-Fungible-Token (NFT) market has experienced explosive growth in recent years. According to DappRadar, the total transaction volume on OpenSea, the largest NFT marketplace, reached 34.7 billion dollars in February 2023. However, the NFT market is mostly unregulated and there are significant concerns about money laundering, fraud and wash trading. The lack of industry-wide regulations, and the fact that amateur traders and retail investors comprise a significant fraction of the NFT market, make this market particularly vulnerable to fraudulent activities. Therefore it is essential to investigate and highlight the relevant risks involved in NFT trading. In this paper, we attempted to uncover common fraudulent behaviors such as wash trading that could mislead other traders. Using market data, we designed quantitative features from the network, monetary, and temporal perspectives that were fed into K-means clustering unsupervised learning algorithm to sort traders into groups. Lastly, we discussed the clustering results’ significance and how regulations can reduce undesired behaviors. Our work can potentially help regulators narrow down their search space for bad actors in the market as well as provide insights for amateur traders to protect themselves from unforeseen frauds. ...

The World Price of Insider Trading ArXiv ID: ssrn-249708 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract The existence and the enforcement of insider trading laws in stock markets is a phenomenon of the 1990s. A study of the 103 countries that have stock markets re Keywords: Insider Trading Laws, Market Regulation, Investor Protection, Legal Enforcement, Stock Market Efficiency, Equities Complexity vs Empirical Score Math Complexity: 2.5/10 Empirical Rigor: 8.0/10 Quadrant: Street Traders Why: The paper relies on descriptive statistics, international asset pricing factor models, and regressions with country-level controls, which involve standard empirical finance methods rather than advanced mathematics. However, it demonstrates high empirical rigor by compiling a comprehensive dataset from 103 countries, using multiple econometric approaches to address the research question, and focusing on measurable outcomes like cost of equity. flowchart TD A["Research Goal<br>What is the world price of<br>insider trading laws?"] --> B["Methodology<br>Econometric analysis of 103 countries"] B --> C["Data Inputs<br>Stock market returns<br>Enforcement indicators"] C --> D["Computational Process<br>Regression analysis of market efficiency"] D --> E["Key Findings<br>Insider trading laws increase<br>market liquidity and efficiency"] E --> F["Outcome<br>Stronger legal enforcement<br>improves equity markets"]