Options

European Option Pricing in Regime Switching Framework via Physics-Informed Residual Learning ArXiv ID: 2410.10474 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract In this article, we employ physics-informed residual learning (PIRL) and propose a pricing method for European options under a regime-switching framework, where closed-form solutions are not available. We demonstrate that the proposed approach serves an efficient alternative to competing pricing techniques for regime-switching models in the literature. Specifically, we demonstrate that PIRLs eliminate the need for retraining and become nearly instantaneous once trained, thus, offering an efficient and flexible tool for pricing options across a broad range of specifications and parameters. ...

Deep learning for quadratic hedging in incomplete jump market ArXiv ID: 2407.13688 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract We propose a deep learning approach to study the minimal variance pricing and hedging problem in an incomplete jump diffusion market. It is based upon a rigorous stochastic calculus derivation of the optimal hedging portfolio, optimal option price, and the corresponding equivalent martingale measure through the means of the Stackelberg game approach. A deep learning algorithm based on the combination of the feedforward and LSTM neural networks is tested on three different market models, two of which are incomplete. In contrast, the complete market Black-Scholes model serves as a benchmark for the algorithm’s performance. The results that indicate the algorithm’s good performance are presented and discussed. In particular, we apply our results to the special incomplete market model studied by Merton and give a detailed comparison between our results based on the minimal variance principle and the results obtained by Merton based on a different pricing principle. Using deep learning, we find that the minimal variance principle leads to typically higher option prices than those deduced from the Merton principle. On the other hand, the minimal variance principle leads to lower losses than the Merton principle. ...

A time-stepping deep gradient flow method for option pricing in (rough) diffusion models ArXiv ID: 2403.00746 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract We develop a novel deep learning approach for pricing European options in diffusion models, that can efficiently handle high-dimensional problems resulting from Markovian approximations of rough volatility models. The option pricing partial differential equation is reformulated as an energy minimization problem, which is approximated in a time-stepping fashion by deep artificial neural networks. The proposed scheme respects the asymptotic behavior of option prices for large levels of moneyness, and adheres to a priori known bounds for option prices. The accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method is assessed in a series of numerical examples, with particular focus in the lifted Heston model. ...

Volatility-based strategy on Chinese equity index ETF options ArXiv ID: 2403.00474 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract This study examines the performance of a volatility-based strategy using Chinese equity index ETF options. Initially successful, the strategy’s effectiveness waned post-2018. By integrating GARCH models for volatility forecasting, the strategy’s positions and exposures are dynamically adjusted. The results indicate that such an approach can enhance returns in volatile markets, suggesting potential for refined trading strategies in China’s evolving derivatives landscape. The research underscores the importance of adaptive strategies in capturing market opportunities amidst changing trading dynamics. ...

Deep Hedging with Market Impact ArXiv ID: 2402.13326 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Dynamic hedging is the practice of periodically transacting financial instruments to offset the risk caused by an investment or a liability. Dynamic hedging optimization can be framed as a sequential decision problem; thus, Reinforcement Learning (RL) models were recently proposed to tackle this task. However, existing RL works for hedging do not consider market impact caused by the finite liquidity of traded instruments. Integrating such feature can be crucial to achieve optimal performance when hedging options on stocks with limited liquidity. In this paper, we propose a novel general market impact dynamic hedging model based on Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) that considers several realistic features such as convex market impacts, and impact persistence through time. The optimal policy obtained from the DRL model is analysed using several option hedging simulations and compared to commonly used procedures such as delta hedging. Results show our DRL model behaves better in contexts of low liquidity by, among others: 1) learning the extent to which portfolio rebalancing actions should be dampened or delayed to avoid high costs, 2) factoring in the impact of features not considered by conventional approaches, such as previous hedging errors through the portfolio value, and the underlying asset’s drift (i.e. the magnitude of its expected return). ...

A monotone piecewise constant control integration approach for the two-factor uncertain volatility model ArXiv ID: 2402.06840 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Option contracts on two underlying assets within uncertain volatility models have their worst-case and best-case prices determined by a two-dimensional (2D) Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) partial differential equation (PDE) with cross-derivative terms. This paper introduces a novel ``decompose and integrate, then optimize’’ approach to tackle this HJB PDE. Within each timestep, our method applies piecewise constant control, yielding a set of independent linear 2D PDEs, each corresponding to a discretized control value. Leveraging closed-form Green’s functions, these PDEs are efficiently solved via 2D convolution integrals using a monotone numerical integration method. The value function and optimal control are then obtained by synthesizing the solutions of the individual PDEs. For enhanced efficiency, we implement the integration via Fast Fourier Transforms, exploiting the Toeplitz matrix structure. The proposed method is $\ell_{"\infty"}$-stable, consistent in the viscosity sense, and converges to the viscosity solution of the HJB equation. Numerical results show excellent agreement with benchmark solutions obtained by finite differences, tree methods, and Monte Carlo simulation, highlighting its robustness and effectiveness. ...

Estimation of domain truncation error for a system of PDEs arising in option pricing ArXiv ID: 2401.15570 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract In this paper, a multidimensional system of parabolic partial differential equations arising in European option pricing under a regime-switching market model is studied in details. For solving that numerically, one must truncate the domain and impose an artificial boundary data. By deriving an estimate of the domain truncation error at all the points in the truncated domain, we extend some results in the literature those deal with option pricing equation under constant regime case only. We differ from the existing approach to obtain the error estimate that is sharper in certain region of the domain. Hence, the minimum of proposed and existing gives a strictly sharper estimate. A comprehensive comparison with the existing literature is carried out by considering some numerical examples. Those examples confirm that the improvement in the error estimates is significant. ...

American options in time-dependent one-factor models: Semi-analytic pricing, numerical methods and ML support ArXiv ID: 2307.13870 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract Semi-analytical pricing of American options in a time-dependent Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model was presented in [“Carr, Itkin, 2020”]. It was shown that to obtain these prices one needs to solve (numerically) a nonlinear Volterra integral equation of the second kind to find the exercise boundary (which is a function of the time only). Once this is done, the option prices follow. It was also shown that computationally this method is as efficient as the forward finite difference solver while providing better accuracy and stability. Later this approach called “the Generalized Integral transform” method has been significantly extended by the authors (also, in cooperation with Peter Carr and Alex Lipton) to various time-dependent one factor, and stochastic volatility models as applied to pricing barrier options. However, for American options, despite possible, this was not explicitly reported anywhere. In this paper our goal is to fill this gap and also discuss which numerical method (including those in machine learning) could be efficient to solve the corresponding Volterra integral equations. ...

Monte Carlo simulation for Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard model under change of measure ArXiv ID: 2306.05750 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract The Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard model is a representative jump-type stochastic volatility model. Still, no method exists to compute option prices numerically for the non-martingale case with infinite active jumps. We develop two simulation methods for such a case under change of measure and conduct some numerical experiments. Keywords: Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard Model, Stochastic Volatility, Jump Diffusion, Option Pricing, Monte Carlo Simulation, Options ...

Backward Hedging for American Options with Transaction Costs ArXiv ID: 2305.06805 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract In this article, we introduce an algorithm called Backward Hedging, designed for hedging European and American options while considering transaction costs. The optimal strategy is determined by minimizing an appropriate loss function, which is based on either a risk measure or the mean squared error of the hedging strategy at maturity. The proposed algorithm moves backward in time, determining, for each time-step and different market states, the optimal hedging strategy that minimizes the loss function at the time the option is exercised, by assuming that the strategy used in the future for hedging the liability is the one determined at the previous steps of the algorithm. The approach avoids machine learning and instead relies on classic optimization techniques, Monte Carlo simulations, and interpolations on a grid. Comparisons with the Deep Hedging algorithm in various numerical experiments showcase the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method. ...