Tracking Error

A comprehensive review and analysis of different modeling approaches for financial index tracking problem ArXiv ID: 2601.03927 “View on arXiv” Authors: Vrinda Dhingra, Amita Sharma, Anubha Goel Abstract Index tracking, also known as passive investing, has gained significant traction in financial markets due to its cost-effective and efficient approach to replicating the performance of a specific market index. This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of the various modeling approaches and strategies developed for index tracking, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each approach. We categorize the index tracking models into three broad frameworks: optimization-based models, statistical-based models and machine learning based data-driven approach. A comprehensive empirical study conducted on the S&P 500 dataset demonstrates that the tracking error volatility model under the optimization-based framework delivers the most precise index tracking, the convex co-integration model, under the statistical-based framework achieves the strongest return-risk balance, and the deep neural network with fixed noise model within the data-driven framework provides a competitive performance with notably low turnover and high computational efficiency. By combining a critical review of the existing literature with comparative empirical analysis, this paper aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of index tracking and its practical implications for investors and fund managers. ...

Covariance-Aware Simplex Projection for Cardinality-Constrained Portfolio Optimization ArXiv ID: 2512.19986 “View on arXiv” Authors: Nikolaos Iliopoulos Abstract Metaheuristic algorithms for cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization require repair operators to map infeasible candidates onto the feasible region. Standard Euclidean projection treats assets as independent and can ignore the covariance structure that governs portfolio risk, potentially producing less diversified portfolios. This paper introduces Covariance-Aware Simplex Projection (CASP), a two-stage repair operator that (i) selects a target number of assets using volatility-normalized scores and (ii) projects the candidate weights using a covariance-aware geometry aligned with tracking-error risk. This provides a portfolio-theoretic foundation for using a covariance-induced distance in repair operators. On S&P 500 data (2020-2024), CASP-Basic delivers materially lower portfolio variance than standard Euclidean repair without relying on return estimates, with improvements that are robust across assets and statistically significant. Ablation results indicate that volatility-normalized selection drives most of the variance reduction, while the covariance-aware projection provides an additional, consistent improvement. We further show that optional return-aware extensions can improve Sharpe ratios, and out-of-sample tests confirm that gains transfer to realized performance. CASP integrates as a drop-in replacement for Euclidean projection in metaheuristic portfolio optimizers. ...

On the hidden costs of passive investing ArXiv ID: 2506.21775 “View on arXiv” Authors: Iro Tasitsiomi Abstract Passive investing has gained immense popularity due to its low fees and the perceived simplicity of focusing on zero tracking error, rather than security selection. However, our analysis shows that the passive (zero tracking error) approach of waiting until the market close on the day of index reconstitution to purchase a stock (that was announced days earlier as an upcoming addition) results in costs amounting to hundreds of basis points compared to strategies that involve gradually acquiring a small portion of the required shares in advance with minimal additional tracking errors. In addition, we show that under all scenarios analyzed, a trader who builds a small inventory post-announcement and provides liquidity at the reconstitution event can consistently earn several hundreds of basis points in profit and often much more, assuming minimal risk. ...

Asset pre-selection for a cardinality constrained index tracking portfolio with optional enhancement ArXiv ID: 2503.18609 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract An index tracker is a passive investment reproducing the return and risk of a market index, an enhanced index tracker offers a return greater than the index. We consider the selection of a portfolio of given cardinality to track an index, both without and with enhancement. We divide the problem into two steps - (1) pre-selection of assets; (2) estimation of weights on the assets chosen. The eight pre-selection procedures considered use: forward selection (FS) or backward elimination (BE); implemented using ordinary least squares (OLS) or least absolute deviation (LAD) regression; with a regression constant (c) or without (n). The two-step approach avoids the NP-hard problem arising when asset selection and asset weight computation are combined, leading to the selection of a cardinality constrained index tracking portfolio by computer intensive heuristic procedures with many examples in the literature solving for portfolios of 10 or fewer assets. Avoiding these restrictions, we show that out-of-sample tracking errors are roughly proportional to 1/sqrt(cardinality). We find OLS more effective than LAD; BE marginally more effective than FS; (n) marginally more effective than (c). For index tracking, both without and with enhancement, we use BE-OLS(n) in sensitivity analyses on the periods used for selection and evaluation. For a S&P 500 index tracker, we find that out-of-sample tracking error, transaction volume and return-risk ratios all improve as cardinality increases. By contrast for enhanced returns, cardinalities of the order 10 to 20 are most effective. The S&P 500 data used from 3/1/2005 to 29/12/2023 is available to researchers. ...

Asset management with an ESG mandate ArXiv ID: 2403.11622 “View on arXiv” Authors: Unknown Abstract We investigate the portfolio frontier and risk premia in equilibrium when institutional investors aim to minimize the tracking error variance under an ESG score mandate. If a negative ESG premium is priced in the market, this mandate can reduce portfolio inefficiency when the return over-performance target is limited. In equilibrium, with asset managers endowed with an ESG mandate and mean-variance investors, a negative ESG premium arises. A result that is supported by empirical data. The negative ESG premium is due to the ESG constraint imposed on institutional investors and is not associated with a risk factor. ...