Statistical arbitrage covers strategies that trade temporary mispricings between related instruments: classic pairs trading, cointegration-based baskets, and mean-reversion signals across equities, futures, and crypto. It is one of the few strategy families where academic papers regularly include real backtests, which makes the rigor score especially useful here.

When reading this literature, three questions separate implementable work from curve-fitting: Does the paper account for transaction costs and shorting constraints? Is the pair-selection rule defined before the backtest window? And does performance survive the post-2010 period, when the classic distance method famously decayed? Papers ranked highly below tend to answer at least two of these.

Related hubs: Market Microstructure, Machine Learning for Forecasting, High-Frequency Trading.

Explainers from the corpus: ARDL models: appropriate use vs p-hacking →